Case Against the Coronavirus Act 2020

High Court Hearing – Latest News

To our Fantastic Supporters,

Our Case was refused at the Court Hearing on 22 April 2021 which, we suppose, should come as no surprise in the current climate. The Judge accepted all the hundreds of unconstitutional ‘laws’ made by the government, ignored all our arguments on the day and merely read out a prior written judgement. This is British ‘justice’ in action – the Courts dictated to by the government.

We feel we have no option other than to Appeal. The Rule of Law is being abused. The whole Parliamentary and Legal System is being abused. We all owe it to ourselves, our children and the generations to come, to unite and fight this in every way we can including in the Courts.

All those interested can find out all about the case on the Crowd Justice Appeal site. Please support us!

Help Us Fight for Our Freedoms

It is more important than ever that people hear about our legal action, and it would be amazing if you could:

  • Share the Case website with everyone you know, and ask them to share it too.
  • Share this on Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and every other social media platform.
  • Also please donate anything you can to our campaign which is for all our futures.

Thank you again for your help in our fight against Government tyranny and oppression. Together we can break down ‘Gates of Hell’, defeat the Dictators and take our lives and freedom back!

About the Case

What is emerging from the ‘Coronavirus crisis’ is a new British Constitution through which the government and media effectively rule the country… A constitution in which ministers make up law without needing parliament’s approval.

This Case challenges the legality of the Coronavirus Act 2020 and its disproportionate inference with our rights and freedoms. We seek to get our powers back where they belong – with the people and not with the politicians. We should not be at the mercy of them and their failed ‘advisors’. We will also be seeking retribution.

It would be no overstatement to say that this Case is now the only thing standing between the UK remaining a parliamentary democracy (as we were before Covid) and a full-blown police state.

Our legal action will also act as a rallying cry to other countries that they do not have to accept the undemocratic seizure of civil liberties either. The UK was, and should be again, the ‘Mother of Democracy’.

In Detail

In 1984, the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act was enacted to allow magistrates powers to restrict the movement of infected sailors or passengers and cargo coming from the docks. There is no mention in this Act of being able to lock down anyone, let alone the whole country.

Yet in last year’s Simon Dolan case, the Lord Chief Justice ruled that Lockdown Regulations were not outside the powers “implicitly” granted in this Act. So in effect, the Lord Chief Justice of England has ruled that any Regulation can be made under any Act, changing any legal right without the need for the ruling party to go to Parliament to approve new legislation.

By all the normal constitutional classifications, this legal ruling means that the British State has transitioned from a liberal parliamentary democracy into a classic “Police State”.

The only case now standing between us and this terrifying prospect is the case in which Lawyer for Liberty member Robin Tillbrook is acting (Dr Kevin Corbett, Stephen Morris and Dr Niall McCrae v Secretary of State Health & Social Care, Secretary of State for Transport, and The Lord Chancellor). This case argues that lockdown is unconstitutional under the English Constitution and in particular under the English Bill of Rights 1688.

If this case fails, then the transformation of undemocratic rule over us is legally complete. We are then legally and constitutionally in the same position as Germany in 1933 after the passing of the Enabling Act, when their judiciary also green-lighted rule by ministerial decree.

It is more important than ever that people hear about our legal action, so please:

Top